Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
public:papers:spw2016 [2016-06-17 13:46] – rostadal | public:papers:spw2016 [2016-12-01 13:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
**In this paper, we:** | **In this paper, we:** | ||
- | * Provided three additional attacker models compared to the one used (Random Key compromise): | + | * Provided three additional attacker models compared to the one used (Random Key compromise): |
- | * key exfiltration model; | + | * Proposed different ways of evaluation of SA protocols: |
- | * passive node control model; | + | * Extended the KMSforWSN framework. The whole framework including the documentation could be download |
- | * active node control model. | + | |
- | * Based on attacker capabilities, | + | |
- | * Proposed different ways of evaluation of SA protocols: ratio of compromised and non-compromised link keys, percentage of secure communication among neighbours, or the percentage of secure communication from nodes to base station. | + | |
- | * Extended the KMSforWSN framework. The whole framework including the documentation could be download | + | |
* Discussed different attacker capabilities and behaviour to parametrise the attacker. | * Discussed different attacker capabilities and behaviour to parametrise the attacker. | ||
- | * Performed an initial comparison of a local and global attacker on Random key compromise and Random node compromise | + | * Performed an initial comparison of a local and global attacker on Random key compromise and Random node compromise |
* Performed an experiment for Passive node control model. | * Performed an experiment for Passive node control model. | ||
- | {{: | + | {{: |
- | //A success rate of SA protocols for a different number of malware infected nodes. A decrease in the percentage of secured links is linear. One can obtain reasonably secure network (more than 85% of secure links) even in case of 7 malware infected nodes considering the hybrid designed protocols are used.// | + | //A success rate of SA protocols for a different number of malware infected nodes. A decrease in the percentage of secured links is linear |