Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
public:papers:acsac2019 [2020-05-14 11:34] – xukroppublic:papers:acsac2019 [2020-06-02 11:22] – [Selected conclusions] xukrop
Line 6: Line 6:
 <TEXT size="large"> <TEXT size="large">
  
-\_{{fa>user}}\_\_//Authors:// Martin Ukrop, Lydia Kraus, Vashek Matyas and Heider Wahsheh+\_{{fa>user}}\_\_//Authors:// [[:publications:authors:martin-ukrop|Martin Ukrop]], Lydia Kraus, [[:publications:authors:vashek-matyas|Vashek Matyas]] and Heider Wahsheh
  
 {{fa>user-circle-o}}\_//Primary contact:// Martin Ukrop %%<%%<mukrop@mail.muni.cz>%%>%% {{fa>user-circle-o}}\_//Primary contact:// Martin Ukrop %%<%%<mukrop@mail.muni.cz>%%>%%
Line 61: Line 61:
   * We had half of the participants interact with real OpenSSL error messages and the other half with our re-designed error messages and documentation. Here is the comparison:   * We had half of the participants interact with real OpenSSL error messages and the other half with our re-designed error messages and documentation. Here is the comparison:
     * The self-signed case was considered significantly less trustworthy with our error message (which we consider a success).     * The self-signed case was considered significantly less trustworthy with our error message (which we consider a success).
-    * The name constrained case was also perceived as less trusted and required less time and less online browsing to undestand.+    * The name constrained case was also perceived as less trusted and required less time and less online browsing to understand.
     * The other attributes were comparable – thus, we see our documentation in these cases as better than the existing one.     * The other attributes were comparable – thus, we see our documentation in these cases as better than the existing one.
   * In the redesigned error messages, we included a link to the documentation. To our surprise, 71% of the participants clicked this link. This suggests a nice opportunity of directing the developers to a usable place recommended by the library designers.   * In the redesigned error messages, we included a link to the documentation. To our surprise, 71% of the participants clicked this link. This suggests a nice opportunity of directing the developers to a usable place recommended by the library designers.