Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
public:papers:acsac2019 [2019-12-18 22:30] – [Talk at DevConf 2019] xukrop | public:papers:acsac2019 [2020-06-02 11:22] – [Selected conclusions] xukrop | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<TEXT size=" | <TEXT size=" | ||
- | \_{{fa> | + | \_{{fa> |
{{fa> | {{fa> | ||
{{fa> | {{fa> | ||
+ | |||
+ | \_{{fa> | ||
</ | </ | ||
</ | </ | ||
Line 59: | Line 61: | ||
* We had half of the participants interact with real OpenSSL error messages and the other half with our re-designed error messages and documentation. Here is the comparison: | * We had half of the participants interact with real OpenSSL error messages and the other half with our re-designed error messages and documentation. Here is the comparison: | ||
* The self-signed case was considered significantly less trustworthy with our error message (which we consider a success). | * The self-signed case was considered significantly less trustworthy with our error message (which we consider a success). | ||
- | * The name constrained case was also perceived as less trusted and required less time and less online browsing to undestand. | + | * The name constrained case was also perceived as less trusted and required less time and less online browsing to understand. |
* The other attributes were comparable – thus, we see our documentation in these cases as better than the existing one. | * The other attributes were comparable – thus, we see our documentation in these cases as better than the existing one. | ||
* In the redesigned error messages, we included a link to the documentation. To our surprise, 71% of the participants clicked this link. This suggests a nice opportunity of directing the developers to a usable place recommended by the library designers. | * In the redesigned error messages, we included a link to the documentation. To our surprise, 71% of the participants clicked this link. This suggests a nice opportunity of directing the developers to a usable place recommended by the library designers. |